Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care.

نویسندگان

  • Henry N Young
  • Robert A Bell
  • Ronald M Epstein
  • Mitchell D Feldman
  • Richard L Kravitz
چکیده

BACKGROUND Although shared decision making (SDM) has been reported to facilitate quality care, few studies have explored the extent to which SDM is implemented in primary care and factors that influence its application. This study assesses the extent to which physicians enact SDM behaviors and describes factors associated with physicians' SDM behaviors within the context of depression care. METHODS In a secondary analysis of data from a randomized experiment, we coded 287 audiorecorded interactions between physicians and standardized patients (SPs) using the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) system to assess physician SDM behaviors. We performed a series of generalized linear mixed model analyses to examine physician and patient characteristics associated with SDM behavior. RESULTS The mean (SD) OPTION score was 11.4 (3.3) of 48 possible points. Older physicians (partial correlation coefficient = -0.29; beta = -0.09; P < .01) and physicians who practiced in a health maintenance organization setting (beta = -1.60; P < .01) performed fewer SDM behaviors. Longer visit duration was associated with more SDM behaviors (partial correlation coefficient = 0.31; beta = 0.08; P < .01). In addition, physicians enacted more SDM behaviors with SPs who made general (beta = 2.46; P < .01) and brand-specific (beta = 2.21; P < .01) medication requests compared with those who made no request. CONCLUSIONS In the context of new visits for depressive symptoms, primary care physicians performed few SDM behaviors. However, physician SDM behaviors are influenced by practice setting and patient-initiated requests for medication. Additional research is needed to identify interventions that encourage SDM when indicated.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Communicating with physicians about medical decisions: a reluctance to disagree.

E ffective patient-physician communication is essential for shared decision making, considered by some to be the “pinnacle” of patientcentered care. Many health care decisions have multiple options and no correct choice. These are called preference-sensitive decisions, and the optimal decision is one that takes into account patient preferences and values in a collaborative process with the phys...

متن کامل

Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer.

BACKGROUND Shared decision-making has become the standard of care for most medical treatments. However, little is known about physician communication practices in the decision making for unstable critically ill patients with known end-stage disease. OBJECTIVE To describe communication practices of physicians making treatment decisions for unstable critically ill patients with end-stage cancer...

متن کامل

Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer

CONTEXT Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. DESIGN Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision ...

متن کامل

The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE Patient-centred depression care approaches should better address barriers of insufficient patient information and involvement in the treatment decision process. Additional research is needed to test the effect of increased patient participation on outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess, if patient participation in decision-making via a shared decision-making intervention leads ...

متن کامل

arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians

BACKGROUND The successful implementation of decision aids in clinical practice initially depends on how clinicians perceive them. Relatively little is known about the acceptance of decision aids by physicians and factors influencing the implementation of decision aids from their point of view. Our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) is to be used within the encounter and has a modu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Archives of internal medicine

دوره 168 13  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008